Understanding Treemap Charts: A Comprehensive Guide for your Data Storytelling

The Component Comparison and its different alternatives

As we discussed in the essential article on Component Comparison, it represents a situation. You need to show an item as a mix of two or more elements. The usual words used with it are: % of Total, Share of, Mix of, Component of, Includes X. You can find it in the world around you every day. Last week, we talked about the Mekko Chart. Today, we take a look at Treemap Charts.

Treemap Chart – Is already 30 years old

The Treemap chart was invented in 1990 by Professor Ben Shneiderman at the University of Maryland. His goal was to visualize large hierarchical datasets efficiently. These datasets often have many branches and sub-branches. The challenge was to fit them within the limited space of a computer screen.

The first use case was visualizing file directory structures to see how much space each folder and file was consuming. This area-based approach enabled a compact and intuitive overview of hierarchical relationships. It made it much easier to spot large and small elements. It also helped find hidden patterns within data structures.

Practical Examples from the Corporate World

Corporate environments often handle massive and hierarchical datasets. These include product portfolios, departmental budgets, sales breakdowns, and asset allocations. The Treemap efficiently summarizes and presents this data in a compact, visual format. They allow executives and analysts to grasp key insights at a glance.

Treemap excels at showing how individual components (such as products, teams, or markets) contribute to the whole. This makes them invaluable for resource allocation, revenue distribution, and market share analysis—core needs for business decision-making.

👉🏻 Advantages

  • Efficient Use of Space: Treemap can show thousands of categories and subcategories. They do this without overwhelming the viewer. This ensures the optimal use of available space.
  • Visualizing Hierarchies: Ideal for showing hierarchical relationships with nested rectangles that represent parent-child structures and part-to-whole comparisons.
  • Quick Pattern Recognition: Size and color coding make it easy to spot trends, anomalies, and relationships across categories. The largest items stand out instantly.
  • Multi-dimensional Display: Treemap use area and color to display two quantitative variables. An example is showing sales amount and growth rate at the same time.
  • Great for Summaries: Useful for high-level overviews and portfolio summaries, allowing users to drill down into details as needed.
  • Flexible & Customizable: Can be interactively filtered, zoomed, or color-coded for greater usability and analytical depth.

👉🏻 Disadvantages

  • Difficult Precise Comparisons: Our brains struggle to compare areas precisely. Getting exact values from rectangle sizes is hard. This is especially true when values are close.
  • Overwhelming with Many Levels: Too many branches can clutter the chart, making individual items difficult to see or label. Small rectangles may become unreadable.
  • Not Suited for Non-hierarchical Data: Treemap work best for hierarchical data. For simple linear lists or categories, bar or column charts are often clearer.
  • Challenging for Printing: Treemap are optimized for interactive screens; printed versions may lose legibility or clarity.
  • No Negative Values: All area sizes must be positive; Treemap cannot show negative or net values.
  • Hard to Track Over Time: Changing area sizes can cause rectangles to rearrange, making tracking specific items over time difficult

Practical Tips to Reduce the Disadvantages

There are always creative ways to help yourself avoid the pitfalls, depending again on the story you choose to tell. Not every piece of data is essential, and not everything needs to be visible or communicated. I have added some tips I’ve learned during my professional journey on the right side of the image below.

Are there other alternatives?

Of course, in the future post I am going to talk about:

  • Sankey Charts and others

Visualizations we have already talked about:

Summary

Treemap charts were invented to efficiently and intuitively represent large, complex hierarchies. Their biggest strengths are space efficiency, high-level pattern recognition, and versatility in visualizing hierarchies and part-to-whole relationships.

However, their limitations include imprecise area comparisons, potential clutter when data is dense, and unsuitability for non-hierarchical or time-based data. Treemap excel in interactive business intelligence, market analysis, and portfolio management dashboards.

For more straightforward or time-tracking applications, other visualization types may be preferable. Properly used, Treemap can transform overwhelming datasets into actionable insight at a glance.

There is always a chart for your story. You need to understand the basic concepts, principles, and language used. This helps you choose what you need to persuade, inform, inspire, or entertain correctly.

For a free downloadable resource, click the Chart Decision Tree and Compare Visual Guide.


Discover more from Visual Wizards Academy

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

11 responses

  1. […] of, Includes X. You can find it in the world around you every day. Last week, we talked about the Treemap Chart. Today, we take a look at Sankey […]

    Like

Leave a reply to Winners, Climbers, and Sliders: Line Bump Charts That Bring Your Data to Life! – Visual Wizards Academy Cancel reply